What are your thoughts on a future where code is represented as a structured model, rather than text? Do you think that AI-powered coding assistants benefit from that?

A slogan that might help you get past the current fads is:

Most coding assistants — with or without “modern “AI” — also do reasoning and manipulation of structures.

First, it’s worth noting that the “syntax recognition” phase of most compilers already does build a “structured model”, often in what used to be called a “canonical form” (an example of this might be a “pseudo-function tree” where every elementary process description is put into the same form — so both “a + b” and “for i := 1 to x do […]” are rendered as

Why is the First Amendment referred to as a right to free speech instead of an immunity from punishment for one's words, regardless of their truthfulness?

a b i 1 x []

NOT DATA … BUT MEANING!

/ \ and ⁄ / | \

Can you explain the difference between God and atma according to the Bhagavad-Gita?

Another canonical form could be Lisp S-expressions, etc.

+ for

These structures are made precisely to allow programs to “reason” about some parts of lower level meaning, and in many cases to rearrange the structure to preserve meaning but to make the eventual code that is generated more efficient.

Were Dalits prohibited from drinking water from wells in ancient times? Is there any evidence to support this claim?

i.e. “operator like things” at the nodes …

plus(a, b) for(i, 1, x, […])

in structures, such as:

Prayers Pouring In After Fatal Car Accident Involving Ohio State Football Legend - Yahoo Sports

It’s important to realize that “modern “AI” doesn’t understand human level meanings any better today (in many cases: worse!). So it is not going to be able to serve as much of a helper in a general coding assistant.

Long ago in the 50s this was even thought of as a kind of “AI” and this association persisted into the 60s. Several Turing Awards were given for progress on this kind of “machine reasoning”.